Harris v. Southwest Power Pool Inc et al
Lawanna Harris |
Brian Smith, Malinda See, Tom Dunn, Stacy Duckett and Southwest Power Pool Inc |
4:2011cv00679 |
September 13, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Little Rock Office |
Pulaski |
J. Leon Holmes |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 70 ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 7/6/12. (kpr) |
Filing 56 ORDER, granting an oral request pursuant to General Order 54 to allow counsel for the parties, including Mike Riley, Brian Smith, Stacy Duckett and Nichole Thompson to bring cell phones, laptop computers, or personal digital asssistants into the courthouse for the 6/13/2012 Settlement Conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 05/29/2012. (kcs) |
Filing 42 OPINION AND ORDER that pltf's 34 MOTION for Protective Order or to Compel is DENIED; pltf's 41 MOTION to Stay the Scheduling Order is likewise DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 2/28/12. (vjt) |
Filing 31 OPINION AND ORDER that pltf's 23 Motion for Collective Action under the FLSA is DENIED WITH PREJUDICE; her request regarding the briefing dates for the proposed state-law class is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 11/8/11. (vjt) |
Filing 21 ORDER denying pltf's 13 Motion for Order Prohibiting Class Contact and for TRO. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 9/30/11. (vjt) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.