Drewry v. 3M Company et al
| Jeff S Drewry |
| 3M Company, Cyprus Amax Minerals Company, Imerys Talc Inc and John Does |
| 4:2012cv00153 |
| March 8, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Little Rock Office |
| Pope |
| D. P. Marshall |
| Personal Injury- Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
81
ORDER finding as moot 68 Motion to Dismiss; granting 78 Motion to Extend Time. Whittaker shall have up to and including August 30, 2013, to answer or otherwise respond to plaintiffs complaint in this action. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 8/7/13. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER substituting that BASF Catalysts LLC shall be substituted in place of BASF Corporation as a defendant in this action in all pleadings and papers served or filed in this action. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 7/12/13. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER dismissing plaintiff's complaint with prejudice as to separate defendant 3M Company. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 5/1/13. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER extending the ddl for the case-in-chief expert disclosure to 2/26/13 and rebuttal disclosures to 3/29/13. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 1/10/13. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER granting 26 Motion for Leave to Appear pro hac vice and admitting Bradlyn J. Cole to appear as co-counsel for the plaintiff. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 8/1/12. (kpr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
