Garris v. J B Hunt Transport Inc et al
| Charlene Garris |
| Elisa Norman, Rhonda Woods, J B Hunt Transport Inc, J B Hunt Transport Services Inc, J B Hunt Logistics Inc, Robert Pflug, Quest Diagnostic Clinical Laboratories Inc and Compliance Safety Systems |
| 4:2012cv00363 |
| June 14, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Little Rock Office |
| Out of State |
| D. P. Marshall |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
66
JUDGMENT dismissing plaintiff's claims against J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc. with prejudice. 63 65 . All of Garris's claims against all other defts are dismissed without prejudice 23 . Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 1/15/14. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER granting in part, denying in part and denying as moot in part, the 6 Motion to Dismiss. The motion to amend (de#18) is granted, as modified. Garris should file her amended complaint, eliminating the dismissed retaliation claim, by August 10, 2012. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 8/2/12. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER granting 19 Motion to Dismiss and finding as moot 14 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Garris's complaint is dismissed without prejudice against all parties except J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 7/19/12. (kpr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
