Bank of the Ozarks v. Captial Mortage Coroporation et al
Bank of the Ozarks |
David E Aronstein, Ronald Lipsitz, Fred B Wachter, Honey Creek Properties Inc, Realty Resources Corporation, Capital Mortgage Corporation, First Financial Funding Inc and Prime Equity Lending Inc |
4:2012mc00021 |
July 5, 2012 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Little Rock Office |
Kristine G. Baker |
Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 OPINION AND ORDER granting 1 Motion to Quash. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 7/18/12. (kpr) |
Filing 6 ORDER granting 5 Motion for Leave to Appear pro hac vice of Andrew J. Lavoie and John A. Christy for defts. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 7/9/12. (kpr) |
Filing 3 ORDER granting 1 Motion to Stay Deposition of George Gleason. The Court will conduct a telephone hearing on the motion Wednesday, July 11, 2012, at 2:00 p.m. CST. Counsel shall provide the Court with a telephone number at which they can be reac hed for the hearing. Defts have until Monday, July 9, 2012, at 5:00 p.m. to file a response to Bank of the Ozark's motion to quash subpoena, motion for protective order, and motion to stay deposition. Pltf shall have until Tuesday, July 10, 2012 at 5:00 p.m. to submit a reply in further support of its motion, should it opt to do so. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 7/5/12. (kpr) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.