Burton v. Metso Paper USA Inc et al
| Tina Burton |
| Metso Paper USA Inc, Metso Corporation, Wartsila North America Inc, Wartsila NSD North America Inc and Doe Corporation |
| 4:2013cv00073 |
| February 15, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Little Rock Office |
| Jefferson |
| Kristine G. Baker |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury-Product Liability |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
145
ORDER dismissing this case with prejudice in accordance with the parties' 143 stipulation of voluntary dismissal and this Court's previous 144 order. As this case has settled, it is removed from the trial calendar for the week of 02/22/2016. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 02/01/2016. (rhm)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER denying 57 Evergreen's motion to quash, or in the alternative, for protective order; granting 61 Ms. Burton's motion for leave to file amended complaint; and, granting 63 Ms. Burton's motion to amend the final scheduling order. Ms. Burton is ordered to file the Amended Complaint within 7 days of entry of the Order. The deadlines in this case are stayed, and an amended final scheduling order will be issued by separate order. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 4/23/2014. (thd)
|
|
Filing
47
PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 11/8/13. (kpr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
