Powell et al v. Camping World RV Sales LLC
Richard G Powell and Debi Y Powell |
Camping World RV Sales LLC |
4:2013cv00195 |
April 3, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Little Rock Office |
Out of State |
Kristine G. Baker |
Contract Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 287 JUDGMENT is entered in favor of separate defendant TLR and against plaintiff Richard Powell on TRL's counter-claim against Mr. Powell. The Court enters judgment in favor of separate defendant TRL in the amount of $15,892.48. Post-judgment interest will accrue at 1.154% per annum from today until this Judgment is paid. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 6/1/2017. (mef) |
Filing 107 ORDER granting 46 motion for Leave to file supplemental complaint; removing this case from the trial docket for 10/27/2014; giving the Powells 10 days, up to and including Friday, 10/24/2014, to re-sign and refile their supplemental complaint; a nd denying as moot 32 37 38 40 41 63 83 84 87 91 93 94 99 motions. The Court directs all parties to confer and advise the Court within 10 days of the date of this Order as to the scope and time needed for additional discovery. A new trial date and new pretrial deadlines will be set by separate order. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 10/16/2014. (rhm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.