Barnett v. Americom Bank et al
Matthew W Barnett |
Americom Bank and Direct Express Payment Processing Services |
4:2013cv00347 |
June 10, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Little Rock Office |
Chicot |
Susan Webber Wright |
H. David Young |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 105 ORDER ADOPTING 103 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of Magistrate Judge. The 80 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Comerica Inc. is granted. The 89 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiff is denied. His complaint is dismissed, and judgment will be entered for Comerica. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 2/14/2014. (mcz) |
Filing 64 ORDER ADOPTING 55 PARTIAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; therefore, pltf's motions to amend 48 and for joinder 41 are GRANTED; defts Americom Bank and Direct Express Payment Processing Services are dismissed without prejudice from this c ase; Comerica Inc is added as the lone deft; pltf's motions for default judgment against Americom and Direct Express 27 , to amend his motion for default judgment 30 , for the entry of a clerk's default 35 , and for preliminary injunction 54 are DENIED. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 10/25/13. (vjt) |
Filing 19 ORDER ADOPTING 15 Partial Report and Recommendations; therefore, pltf's motions for writ of mandamus 10 12 and his motion to stay proceedings 17 18 are denied. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 8/20/13. (vjt) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.