Cherepski v. Apple Inc

Plaintiff: Donald Cherepski
Defendant: Apple Inc
Case Number: 4:2013cv00433
Filed: July 26, 2013
Court: Arkansas Eastern District Court
Office: Little Rock Office
County: Arkansas
Presiding Judge: Brian S. Miller
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 17, 2014 23 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION AND ORDER denying 12 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 07/17/2014. (rhm)
January 23, 2015 27 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER DISMISSING CASE pursuant to 26 stipulation of dismissal with prejudice, each party to bear his or its own costs and fees incurred in the litigation. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 01/23/2015. (rhm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cherepski v. Apple Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Donald Cherepski
Represented By: Lloyd W. Kitchens, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Apple Inc
Represented By: Eva C. Madison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.