Jones v. Faulkner County et al
| Russell E Jones |
| Faulkner County, Andy Shock, John Randall, Lloyd Vincent and John Does |
| 4:2013cv00583 |
| October 4, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Little Rock Office |
| Faulkner |
| Susan Webber Wright |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Other Civil Rights |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
96
ORDER granting the 92 motion to dismiss filed by separate defendants Nancy Bryant, Lance Culberson, and Billy Kelly; dismissing all claims against these separate defendants with prejudice because they are time- barred; and dismissing all c laims against absent defendants Pamela Carter, Katoya Douglas, Zachary Gibbs, Uniece Jackson, Charles Myers, and Megan Waters without prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 1/10/2017. (mef)
|
|
Filing
22
JUDGMENT: Consistent with the 21 Opinion and Order that was entered on this day, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged that Plaintiff's claims Plaintiff's claims arising under federal law are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and Plaintiff's supplemental claims brought pursuant to state law are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. This action is hereby DISMISSED IN ITS ENTIRETY. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 10/20/2014. (ks)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
