Aikens et al v. Hennigan et al
| Charles Robinson and Alvin Aikens |
| M Briggs, J Hennigan, R Murphy and Doc Holiday |
| 4:2013cv00664 |
| November 20, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Little Rock Office |
| Pulaski |
| J. Leon Holmes |
| H. David Young |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
ORDER adopting 32 Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; granting in part and denying in part 26 Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff's claims against all def endants in their official capacity are dismissed without prejudice. All of plaintiff's claims against Holladay and Briggs are dismissed with prejudice, and Holladay and Briggs are removed as party defendants. Plaintiff's inadequate medica l care claims are dismissed with prejudice. The motion is denied to the extent that plaintiff is allowed to proceed with his excessive force claims against defendants Hennigan and Murphy in their individual capacity only. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 12/2/2014. (ks)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER ADOPTING 3 PARTIAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Charles Robinson's claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and Robinson is removed as a party plaintiff. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 01/10/2014. (rhm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
