Fort v. Jonesboro Arkansas, City of et al
| Lonnell Isaiah Fort |
| Jonesboro Arkansas, City of, Michael Yates, Joe K Robinson, Brett Nolen, Robert W Geha, Cody Coley and John Does |
| 4:2013cv00747 |
| December 30, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Little Rock Office |
| Pulaski |
| J. Leon Holmes |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: Having been notified that a settlement has been reached in this matter, the Court finds that this case should be dismissed. The complaint and all claims in this action against defendants be, and they are, hereby dismissed with pre judice. The Court retains complete jurisdiction for 30 days to vacate this order and to reopen the action if it is satisfactorily shown that settlement has not been completed and further litigation is necessary. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 10/14/2015. (ks)
|
|
Filing
20
OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 13 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Because Yates has not carried his burden to show there is no genuine dispute of material fact, his motion for summary judgment is DENIED. The City's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. All claims against the City of Jonesboro, including the official capacity claims against the individual defendants, are dismissed. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 1/23/2015. (ks)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
