Naples v. Williams et al
Appellee:
Michael E Collins and Renee S Williams
Appellant:
James J Naples
Case Number:
4:2014cv00201
Filed:
March 28, 2014
Court:
Arkansas Eastern District Court
Office:
Little Rock Office
County:
Pulaski
Presiding Judge:
J. Leon Holmes
Nature of Suit:
Appeal
Cause of Action:
28:0158
Jury Demanded By:
None
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Date Filed | # | Document Text |
|---|---|---|
| September 29, 2014 | 21 |
ORDER reversing the substitution Order on the effective date in Case No. 4:13-cv-547. No-automatic-termination order in Case No. 4:13-cv-499 affirmed. Order denying relief from the stay in Case No. 4:14-cv-201 affirmed. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 9/29/2014. (jak)
|
| September 26, 2014 | 20 |
ORDER denying on jurisdiction Motions to Dismiss - 11 , 13 , 17 , 20 , & 22 - but denying without prejudice to renewal of the no-standing points in the merits briefing. Appellants' briefs due by 15 October 2014, appellee's briefs due twenty-one days after filing of the brief being responded to; reply briefs due ten days thereafter. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 9/26/2014. (jak)
|
| July 11, 2014 | 19 |
ORDER consolidating this case with the lead case 4:13-cv-499. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 7/11/2014. (jak)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
