Reeves v. Johnson et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|July 26, 2016
ORDER granting 54 joint motion to dismiss and dismissing this action with prejudice. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 07/26/2016. (rhm)
|July 27, 2015
ORDER allowing Mr. Reeves forty-five days from the date of this Order to ascertain a valid service address for Dr. Johnson and to file a "Motion for Service" so that service can be attempted at that address. Claims against Dr. Johnson may be dismissed if Mr. Reeves fails to timely comply with this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 7/27/2015. (jak)
|May 14, 2015
ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING 7 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED PARTIAL DISPOSITION in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; allowing Plaintiff to proceed with his inadequate medical care claims against defendants Johnson, Okoh, and Little; dismissing without prejudice Plaintiff's claims against Hollowday, Morgan, and Maximum Medical Services; directing the Clerk to prepare a summons for defendants Johnson, Okoh, and Little; directing the U.S. Marshal to serve the summons, 2 Complaint, 6 Amended Complaint, and this Order on them without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefor; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 05/14/2014. (rhm)
|October 9, 2014
INITIAL ORDER for pro se prisoners. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 10/09/2014. (kcs)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?