Graham v. Social Security Administration

Plaintiff: Sherry L Graham
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 4:2015cv00101
Filed: February 18, 2015
Court: Arkansas Eastern District Court
Office: Little Rock Office
County: Van Buren
Referring Judge: Beth Deere
Presiding Judge: J. Leon Holmes
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42:405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 23, 2016 21 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER adopting 18 Report and Recommendations; the decision of the Commissioner to deny disability benefits to Sherry Lynn Graham is affirmed; the Complaint of Sherry Lynn Graham is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 2/23/16. (tjb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Graham v. Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sherry L Graham
Represented By: Timothy M. White(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Represented By: Stacey Elise McCord(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?