Gall et al v. Robertson et al

Plaintiff: Stacy Gall and Cathie Gall
Defendant: Adam Robertson, James Potter, James Foster and Chris Holmes
Case Number: 4:2015cv00210
Filed: April 13, 2015
Court: Arkansas Eastern District Court
Office: Little Rock Office
County: Pulaski
Presiding Judge: Susan Webber Wright
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 1, 2015 31 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 30 motion to reinstate case. This action is hereby dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 12/1/2015. (ks)
November 12, 2015 29 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 28 Motion to Dismiss. This action is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, conditioned upon Plaintiff's payment of duplicative costs, if any, in the event this case is refiled. Plaintiffs have 10 days from the entry date of this order in which to withdraw the motion for voluntary dismissal, in which case this order will be vacated and the case reinstated. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 11/12/2015. (ks)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gall et al v. Robertson et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stacy Gall
Represented By: David Carl Hawkey
Represented By: R. David Lewis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cathie Gall
Represented By: David Carl Hawkey
Represented By: R. David Lewis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Adam Robertson
Represented By: Phillip M. Brick, Jr.
Represented By: David M. Fuqua
Represented By: Jamie Marie Huffman Jones
Represented By: Kaylen Suzanne Lewis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Potter
Represented By: Phillip M. Brick, Jr.
Represented By: David M. Fuqua
Represented By: Jamie Marie Huffman Jones
Represented By: Kaylen Suzanne Lewis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Foster
Represented By: Phillip M. Brick, Jr.
Represented By: David M. Fuqua
Represented By: Jamie Marie Huffman Jones
Represented By: Kaylen Suzanne Lewis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chris Holmes
Represented By: Phillip M. Brick, Jr.
Represented By: David M. Fuqua
Represented By: Jamie Marie Huffman Jones
Represented By: Kaylen Suzanne Lewis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?