Smith v. Arkansas Board of Election Commissioners et al
| Fred Smith |
| Arkansas Board of Election Commissioners, Cross County Elections Commission, Crittenden County Election Commission, Mike Bebe and Mark Martin |
| 4:2015cv00521 |
| August 19, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Little Rock Office |
| Crittenden |
| Beth Deere |
| James M. Moody |
| Voting |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1973 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
JUDGMENT: Consistent with the 50 Order that was entered on this day, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged that this case is hereby dismissed, with prejudice. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 4/5/2016. (ljb)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER denying 14 Motion for Entry of Default. The Clerk of the Court is directed to prepare new summonses for the Arkansas Board of Election Commissioners, Cross County Election Commission, Crittenden County Election Commission, Mike Beebe, and S ecretary of State Mark Martin. The U.S. Marshal is directed to serve a summons, complaint, and this Order on each of the defendants as set forth under Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 11/30/2015. (jak)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER ADOPTING 5 Partial Recommended Disposition. Defendant Mary McGowan is hereby DISMISSED from the lawsuit, with prejudice. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 9/14/2015. (mcz)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
