Bradbury v. Holitik et al
| Spencer Bradbury |
| W Andrew Holitik, Edward Wagoner and W Andrew Holitik Floral Events Aesthetics |
| W Andrew Holitik, W Andrew Holitik Floral Events Aesthetics and Edward Wagoner |
| Spencer Bradbury |
| 4:2015cv00644 |
| October 16, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Little Rock Office |
| Out of State |
| J. Leon Holmes |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
89
AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER denying Bradbury's 77 motion for partial summary judgment. Remaining for trial are Bradbury's claim for breach of contract, or in the alternative for unjust enrichment and the defendants' counterclaim for breach of contract, or in the alternative for unjust enrichment. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 4/7/2017. (ljb)
|
|
Filing
88
OPINION AND ORDER denying Bradbury's 77 motion for partial summary judgment. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 4/6/2017. (ljb)
|
|
Filing
53
OPINION AND ORDER denying the plaintiff's 47 motion for reconsideration; and deferring action on separate defendant Wagoner's 45 motion for attorney's fees until a final judgment is rendered. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 6/3/2016. (ljb)
|
|
Filing
44
OPINION AND ORDER granting the defendants' 35 motion to dismiss converted to a motion for summary judgment as to the claims against Wagoner. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 5/2/2016. (ljb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
