Marziale v. Silas

Plaintiff: Christina Marziale
Defendant: Phyliss Silas
Case Number: 4:2015cv00655
Filed: October 21, 2015
Court: Arkansas Eastern District Court
Office: Little Rock Office
County: Jefferson
Presiding Judge: J. Leon Holmes
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 8, 2015 23 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT: Pursuant to the 22 Order entered separately today, Christina Marziale's claims under 42 U.S.C.§ 1983 are dismissed without prejudice. Her claims under the laws of the State of Arkansas are remanded to the Circuit Court of Pulaski County, Arkansas. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 12/8/2015. (ljb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Marziale v. Silas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christina Marziale
Represented By: Lucien Ramseur Gillham
Represented By: Luther Oneal Sutter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Phyliss Silas
Represented By: Christine A. Cryer
Represented By: Travis J. Fowler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?