Greenwell et al v. Howard Group et al
| Paige Greenwell and Zachary Fluker |
| Howard Group, R Wings R Wild LLC and Conway Wild Wings LLC |
| 4:2015cv00742 |
| December 4, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Little Rock Office |
| Out of State |
| D. P. Marshall |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
158
JUDGMENT: The second amended complaint is dismissed with prejudice. The Court retains jurisdiction to oversee the settlement and resolve any issues that arise under it. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 3/6/2018. (jak)
|
|
Filing
141
ORDER granting 131 Motion to strike supplemental report. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 12/13/2017. (jak)
|
|
Filing
130
ORDER denying 125 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 9/8/2017. (jak)
|
|
Filing
121
ORDER partly granting and mostly denying 113 Motion to clarify, reconsider, provide an amended expert report, or certify for interlocutory appeal. Slate can testify about her observations of the work at the Defendants' restaurants. And - with important limitations - she can testify about general practices in the restaurant business based on her experience. What she may not do, directly or indirectly, is tell the jury what the law required in these circumstances or that these restaurants followed that law. The title of Slate's positions with the Department of Labor should not be mentioned. Slate may not explicitly or implicitly tie the practices she's observed into what's proper under the law, either regulatory or stat utory. It's the Defendants' decision whether to have Slate use her expertise and testify at trial about them. The Court will not certify this issue under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). It's not the sort of extraordinary, unsettled question appropriate for immediate review. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 8/9/2017. (jak)
|
|
Filing
103
ORDER: The Court appreciates the parties' joint report, 102 . All material things considered, the Defendants have made a sufficient, albeit unsuccessful, effort to get the data in the format Greenwell and Fluker want. FED. R. CIV. P. 26(b)(l). Plaintiffs are free to pursue targeted third-party discovery about the time-lapse data-at plaintiffs' own expense. But the Court encourages everyone to make do with what's in hand. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 4/12/2017. (jak)
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER: Joint reports 74 , 76 & 79 , noted. The Court will hold a ninety-minute hearing on these issues at 9:00 a.m. on 2/10/2017 in Courtroom B155 of the Richard S. Arnold Courthouse in Little Rock. The other mentioned discovery disputes should be presented in one more joint report by 1/31/2017. No depositions until after the hearing. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 1/24/2017. (jak)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER conditionally certifying a collective action. The group includes current and former servers and bartenders at Buffalo Wild Wing restaurants owned by Jeromy Howard in Arkansas and Oklahoma. The Court approves the notice as proposed, 37 . Defend ants must provide plaintiffs with a list of possible collective-action members in a usable electronic format by 7/22/2016. The list must include each person's name, last known address, dates of employment, and employer ID number. The opt-in period will close 9/15/2016. Motion 36 mostly granted and partly denied. Motion, 30 , denied as moot. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 7/7/2016. (jak)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER: The Court applauds the parties' seeming agreement, 30 ; but the Court must make an independent Judgment. Motion for conditional certification due by 23 May 2016. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 5/9/2016. (jak)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
