Planned Parenthood Arkansas & Eastern Oklahoma et al v. Jegley et al
Planned Parenthood Arkansas & Eastern Oklahoma and Stephanie Ho |
Larry Jegley and Matt Durrett |
4:2015cv00784 |
December 28, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Little Rock Office |
Pulaski |
Kristine G. Baker |
Constitutionality of State Statutes |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 198 ORDER granting 187 motion to dismiss without prejudice. Plaintiffs' 184 amended complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 8/2/2022. (jbh) |
Filing 189 ORDER LIFTING STAY. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 6/27/2019. (jbh) |
Filing 142 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER granting 116 plaintiffs' second motion for preliminary injunction. This preliminary injunction remains in effect until further order from this Court. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 7/2/2018. (thd) |
Filing 114 TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER granting 84 PPAEO and Dr. Ho's motion for temporary restraining order. This temporary restraining order shall expire by its own terms on Monday, 7/2/2018 at 5:00 p.m. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 6/18/2018. (thd) |
Filing 9 ORDER OF TRANSFER. Judge Wright will recuse due to senior status. The Court directs the Clerk to assign this action to another Judge. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 12/28/2015. (jak) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.