Jolly et al v. Chi et al
| Alison Jolly and Matthew Johnson |
| Lulu Chi, Jacob Chi and Jansen Chi |
| 4:2016cv00009 |
| January 7, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Little Rock Office |
| Pulaski |
| D. P. Marshall |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
JUDGMENT: The complaint is dismissed with prejudice. The Court retains jurisdiction to resolve any settlement-related issue until 12/1/2017. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 11/16/2017. (jak)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER: The Court makes explicit what is implied in its recent 52 Order. The Court approves and certifies unconditionally the following agreed group of similarly situated people for settlement of the group members' FLSA claims only:Former serve rs classified as hourly and non-exempt employees and employed by R J Tao at "Oishi" in Little Rock, Arkansas between September 15, 2014 through October 15, 2015 who consent to join this lawsuit. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 6/12/2017. (jak)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER granting as modified 49 & 51 Joint Motion to approve proposed settlement agreement and related papers. The proposed deal (with one change) is fair, reasonable, and adequate. The change: The Court does not approve Article 7 on confidentialit y, and it is severed from the agreement, which the proposal allows to be done with unenforceable terms. The Court will have the Clerk file the lawyers' bill as part of the record under seal, 38 . The parties should file a joint status report, including a sealed addendum listing opt-ins and payments by 11/15/2017. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 6/8/2017. (jak)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER: The Court held a hearing today on the joint motion to approve the proposed settlement agreement. At the hearing, the Court expressed its concerns about the proposed settlement's confidentiality provisions and the mixing of collective and class action claims in the settlement process for non-parties. A joint report on these issues is due by 5/12/2017. The 43 Motion to approve is denied without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 4/28/2017. (jak)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER denying without prejudice 3 Motion to Certify. The issue needs to be re-briefed under federal law. The motion is premature too. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 1/8/2016. (jak)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
