Wahrmund v. Buschman et al
Plaintiff: John Wahrmund
Defendant: Terry Buschman, Ryan Buschman and Cattle Connections LLC
Case Number: 4:2016cv00137
Filed: March 11, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Office: Little Rock Office
County: Conway
Presiding Judge: Kristine G. Baker
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 111 ORDER adopting the parties' 110 joint stipulation of dismissal with prejudice; dismissing the action with prejudice, including all counterclaims, cross-claims, and third party claims that were brought or could have been brought; denying as moot 105 plaintiff's motion to enforce settlement agreement; and removing the motion hearing in this matter from this Court's calendar for Friday, 11/22/2019, at 1:30 p.m. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 11/22/2019. (jbh)
June 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 100 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 75 the Buschmans' objection to Wahrmund's use of applications for USDA flood benefits; finding as moot 76 Wahrmund's motion to declare witness unavailable; finding as moot 79 motion to strike improper deposition testimony designated by defendants; granting 86 motion to quash subpoena. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 6/27/2019. (jbh)
June 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 90 ORDER granting 73 motion in limine regarding the prohibition of defendants from referencing the prior litigation concerning John Wahrmund's dispute with a prior feed vendor and regarding the limitations of defendants' questions concerning the subpoenaed materials from Rabo Agrifinance. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 6/24/2019. (jbh)
March 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER removing this case from the trial calendar. The Court will set a new trial date by separate Order. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 3/12/2018. (jak)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wahrmund v. Buschman et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Wahrmund
Represented By: Alexander Cale Block
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Terry Buschman
Represented By: John Blume Buzbee
Represented By: John R. Buzbee
Represented By: Leon Mitchell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ryan Buschman
Represented By: John Blume Buzbee
Represented By: John R. Buzbee
Represented By: Leon Mitchell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cattle Connections LLC
Represented By: John R. Beasley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?