USA v. $284,950.00 in U.S. Currency
| USA |
| $284,950.00 in U.S. Currency |
| Nikkolas Thompson |
| 4:2016cv00168 |
| March 30, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Little Rock Office |
| Pulaski |
| Brian S. Miller |
| Drug Related Seizure of Property |
| 21 U.S.C. ยง 881 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
JUDGMENT: Consistent with the order entered on this day, default judgment is entered for the United States. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 5/25/2018. (kdr)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER denying 13 the United States's motion to strike Thompson's verified claim and answer; denying as moot 19 the United States's motion for leave to file a reply in support of its motion to strike and 21 Thompson's motion to strike the United States's motion for leave to file a reply; directing Thompson to supplement his responses to the special interrogatories, with the exception of interrogatory 5, as requested by the United States within 21 days of the date of this order; and granting 12 the United States's motion to continue the trial and for the issuance of an amended scheduling order. The case is hereby returned to the active docket and an amended scheduling order will issue. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 7/27/2017. (kdr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
