Helms v. Ford Enginering Inc et al
| Cyrel Helms |
| Ford Enginering Inc and Robert Trent Ford |
| 4:2016cv00541 |
| July 27, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Little Rock Office |
| Pope |
| D. P. Marshall |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
JUDGMENT: The complaint is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 3/2/2018. (jak)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER granting as modified 11 Motion. The Court certifies this group "All hourly construction workers employed by Defendants Ford Engineering, Inc. and Robert Trent Ford at any time between July 27, 2013 and August 3, 2017". It is not a class, it's a group pursuing a collective action. Calling it a class invites confusion because of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23. The Court approves the proposed notice, consent, and reminder postcard with some revision as follows: Add th e end date for the group; and replace all references to a class with references to the group or the collective action. The Court declines to make the other changes requested by Ford. Fords' spreadsheet of names should include home addresses and telephone numbers (home and cell). Nothing else is necessary. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 8/3/2017. (jak)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
