Kinney v. Holiday et al
| Raymond J Kinney |
| Charles Holiday and Pratt |
| 4:2016cv00716 |
| October 6, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Little Rock Office |
| Pulaski |
| Kristine G. Baker |
| Beth Deere |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
81
JUDGMENT: Consistent with the 80 Order entered on this day, this case is hereby dismissed. The relief requested is denied. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 8/29/2019. (jbh)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER approving and adopting 64 Partial Recommended Disposition; and denying 60 plaintiff Raymond Kinney's motion for summary judgment. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 10/26/2018. (cmn)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER concluding that the 28 Recommended Disposition should not be adopted as this Court's findings; adopting the 7 Partial Recommended Disposition as this Court's findings in its entirety; dismissing without prejudice Mr. Kinney' s claims against defendants in their official capacities and claims against defendant Holiday in his individual capacity; instructing the Clerk to mail to Mr. Kinney copies of all docket entries in this matter entered since on or after 12/5/2016 (Dkt. Nos. 15-36); and requesting that Judge Deere review Sealed Dkt. No. 29 to determine whether service upon defendant Huitt is appropriate in this matter. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 7/14/2017. (mef)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
