Mayfield v. Briann et al
| William Timothy Mayfield |
| Briann and Massiet |
| 4:2016cv00736 |
| October 11, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Little Rock Office |
| Saline |
| J. Thomas Ray |
| Susan Webber Wright |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
ORDER approving and adopting the 8 Recommendation in its entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; dismissing with prejudice William Timothy Mayfield's claim against the Saline County Detention Facility; allowing Mayfield to pr oceed with his inadequate dental care claim against Briann and Massiet; directing the Clerk to prepare a summons for Briann and Massiet; directing the U.S. Marshal to serve the summons, 2 complaint, 6 amended complaint, and 10 motion for a p reliminary injunction and this Order on them without prepayment of fees, costs, or security therefor; directing the individual responding to service to file a sealed statement containing the unserved defendant's last know private mailing address , if either defendant is no longer a Saline County employee; directing the Defendants to file with their answer a response to Mayfield's motion for preliminary injunction; and certifying that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 1/4/2017. (mef)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
