James v. Cheatdum et al
| David N James |
| Eric Cheatdum and North Little Rock Police Department |
| 4:2016cv00835 |
| November 15, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Little Rock Office |
| Pulaski |
| Kristine G. Baker |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
64
JUDGMENT: Pursuant to the 63 Order entered in this case on this date, the Court enters judgment in favor of defendants. The Court dismisses with prejudice plaintiff David N. James's claims. Mr. James's request for relief is denied. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 9/12/2019. (jbh)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER granting 25 plaintiff's motion for status update and lifting the stay, permitting this case to proceed. An Amended Final Scheduling Order will be entered by separate Order. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 10/9/2018. (thd)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER directing the Clerk of the Court to substitute Mike Davis for the John Doe defendant; directing the Clerk of the Court to prepare summons for Mr. Davis through the North Little Rock Police Department; and directing the U.S. Marshal to serve a copy of the complaint and summons on Mr. Davis without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefor. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 7/13/2017. (mef)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
