Hannibal et al v. TRW Vehicle Safety Systems Inc
| Chris Hannibal and Leanna Hannibal |
| TRW Vehicle Safety Systems Inc |
| 4:2016cv00904 |
| December 15, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Little Rock Office |
| Saline |
| J. Leon Holmes |
| Motor Vehicle Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
151
OPINION AND ORDER denying 145 motion for new trial. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 11/13/2018. (ljb)
|
|
Filing
142
JUDGMENT entered in favor of TRW Vehicle Safety Systems, Inc., against Chris Hannibal and Leanna Castillo, Individually and as Co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of Krista Sue Hannibal, Deceased. The complaint of the plaintiff is hereby dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 9/20/2018. (ljb)
|
|
Filing
70
OPINION AND ORDER denying 49 TRW's motion to exclude the testimony of expert Steven Meyer; denying 46 TRW's motion for summary judgment on product liability claims; denying 45 plaintiffs' motion to exclude testimony of the defen dant's experts; granting 37 TRW's motion to exclude the loss of life testimony of Dr. Rebecca Summary; denying 39 TRW's motion to exclude James Chamberlin's seatbelt statements; and denying 41 TRW's motion for summary judgment on alleged conscious pain and suffering damages. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 8/9/2018. (ljb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
