Barnett v. Wallace et al
| Matthew W Barnett |
| James Wallace, John Felts, Jenny Riley, Abraham Carpenter, John Belken and Andy Shock |
| 4:2017cv00116 |
| February 28, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Little Rock Office |
| Jackson |
| Kristine G. Baker |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
JUDGMENT: Pursuant to 25 Order 2 plaintiff Matthew Barnett's claims for money damages and injunctive relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against defendants James Wallace, John Felts, Jenny Riley, Abraham Carpenter, John Belken, and Andy Shock , both in their official and individual capacities, are dismissed consistent with the terms of the Court's Order. Mr. Barnett's claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101, et seq. and Section 504 of the Rehabil itation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 794 against defendants James Wallace, John Felts, Jenny Riley, Abraham Carpenter, John Belken, and Andy Shock, both in their official and individual capacities, are dismissed without prejudice. The relief sought by Mr. Barnett is denied. Dismissal of this action counts as a strike and the Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the Order and Judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 3/31/2018. (cmn)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
