McGehee et al v. Hutchinson et al
| Jason McGehee |
| Asa Hutchinson and Wendy Kelley |
| Stacey Johnson, Marcel Williams, Kenneth Williams, Bruce Ward, Ledell Lee, Jack Jones, Don Davis and Terrick Nooner |
| Fresenius Kabi USA LLC and West-Ward Pharmaceuticals Corporation |
| 4:2017cv00179 |
| March 27, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Little Rock Office |
| Lincoln |
| Kristine G. Baker |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
207
JUDGMENT: Consistent with the 206 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law entered by the Court in this matter, the Court enters judgment as follows: Defendants Asa Hutchinson, who is sued in his official capacity as Governor of Arkansas, and Wendy Kelley, who is sued in her official capacity as Director of the Arkansas Department of Correction, are entitled to judgment in their favor on claim one filed by plaintiffs Stacey Johnson, Bruce Ward, Terrick Nooner, and Don Davis, as well as interven or-plaintiffs Justin Anderson, Ray Dansby, Gregory Decay, Kenneth Isom, Alvin Jackson, Latavious Johnson, Timothy Kemp, Brandon Lacy, Zachariah Marcyniuk, Roderick Rankin, Andrew Sasser, Thomas Springs, and Mickey Thomas (collectively, plaintiffs) un der the Eighth Amendment; Defendants are entitled to judgment in their favor on plaintiffs claim two under the Eighth Amendment and the Equal Protection Clause; and Plaintiffs are entitled to judgment in their favor, in part, and defendants are entit led to judgment in their favor, in part, on plaintiffs claims three and four under the First Amendment and the right to counsel under 18 U.S.C. § 3599. The Court orders relief consistent with the terms of its prior 206 Order. Specifically, the Court memorializes the 62 Joint Execution Viewing Policy entered into by the parties prior to the April 2017 executions and followed during the April 2017 executions, and, per the parties on-the-record representations, the Court directs the parties, absent good cause, to abide by the Joint Execution Viewing Policy. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 5/31/2020. (jbh)
|
|
Filing
165
ORDER denying 142 , 143 plaintiffs' motions in limine to exclude certain anticipated testimony of Dr. Buffington and Dr. Antognini. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 4/12/2019. (jbh)
|
|
Filing
76
ORDER denying 73 plaintiffs' motion to modify joint proposed execution viewing policy. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 4/23/2017. (thd)
|
|
Filing
54
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER finding that plaintiffs are entitled to a preliminary injunction based on their method of execution claim under the Eighth Amendment. Defendants are enjoined during the pendency of this action from carrying into executio n the death sentences of Jason McGehee, Stacey Johnson, Marcel Williams, Kenneth Williams, Bruce Ward, Ledell Lee, Jack Jones, Don Davis, and Terrick Nooner. The Court finds that plaintiffs are entitled to a preliminary injunction based on their cha llenge to Director Kelley's viewing policies and enjoins Director Kelley from implementing the viewing policies insofar as they infringe plaintiffs' right to counsel and right of access to the courts. The parties are directed to confer and jointly present to this Court an appropriately tailored viewing policy by 12:00 p.m., Monday, 4/17/2017. Plaintiffs' 30 motion in limine to exclude or limit the testimony of Daniel E. Buffington is denied. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 4/15/2017. (thd)
|
|
Filing
18
PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 4/4/2017. (thd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
