Johnson v. Hutchinson et al
Stacey Johnson |
Asa Hutchinson and Wendy Kelley |
4:2017cv00181 |
March 27, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Little Rock Office |
Lincoln |
Kristine G. Baker |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: The Court determines that defendants are entitled to judgment in their favor on plaintiffs' claim one under the Eighth Amendment and on plaintiffs' claim two under the Eighth Amendment and the Equal Protection Clause. The Court determines that plaintiffs are entitled to judgment in their favor, in part, and that defendants are entitled to judgment in their favor, in part, on plaintiffs' claims three and four under the First Amendment and th e right to counsel under 18 U.S.C. § 3599. The Court orders relief consistent with the terms of this Order. Specifically, the Court memorializes the 62 Joint Execution Viewing Policy entered into by the parties prior to the April 2017 executio ns and followed during the April 2017 executions, and, per the parties' on-the-record representations, the Court directs the parties, absent good cause, to abide by the Joint Execution Viewing Policy [Docketed in Lead Case 4:17-cv-00179 KGB and all member cases]. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 5/31/2020. (jbh) |
Filing 8 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER entered in Lead Case 4:17-cv-00179-KGB. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 4/15/2017. (thd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.