Faber v. Munyun et al
| Robert Faber |
| Monte Munyun, Brawley, Gary Andrews and Garry Stewart |
| 4:2018cv00123 |
| February 12, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Little Rock Office |
| Faulkner |
| Beth Deere |
| J. Leon Holmes |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
58
JUDGMENT: Consistent with 57 Order that was entered on this day, this case is hereby dismissed, without prejudice. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 2/28/2019. (ljb)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER approving and adopting 48 Partial Recommended Disposition as this Court's findings in all respects; granting 27 motion for partial summary judgment; and dismissing, without prejudice, Faber's state medical negligence claim against Clark Family Dentistry. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 2/5/2019. (ljb)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER adopting in all respects in its entirety 12 the Partial Recommended Disposition; dismissing without prejudice Faber's claims against Defendants Andrews and Stewart; dismissing with prejudice his claims against Defendant Faulkner County J ail; and allowing Faber to proceed with deliberate-indifference claims against Defendants Munyan, Brawley, and Clark Family Dentistry, and with a medical malpractice claim against Clark Family Dentistry. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 5/8/2018. (kdr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
