Pitts v. Lindsey & Company Inc

Pitts v. Lindsey & Company Inc

Plaintiff:	Lakin Pitts
Defendant:	Lindsey & Company Inc
Case Number:	4:2018cv00124
Filed:	February 12, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Office:	Little Rock Office
County:	Pulaski
Presiding Judge:	J. Leon Holmes
Nature of Suit:	Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action:	29 U.S.C. § 201
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 17, 2019	Filing 55 JUDGMENT: Pursuant to 54 findings of fact and conclusions of law entered separately today, the Court declares that Lakin Pitts's disability was a motivating factor in Lindsey & Company's decision to terminate her employment. Because Lin dsey & Company would have terminated her regardless of her disability and her requests for an accommodation; because Pitts could perform the essential functions of her job without an accommodation; and because the evidence showed that Lindsey & Compa ny provided a reasonable accommodation by providing a quiet place to record training videos, judgment is entered in favor of Lindsey & Company on the claims of Lakin Pitts. No damages or equitable relief will be awarded. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 5/17/2019. (ljb)
March 8, 2019	Filing 40 OPINION AND ORDER denying 24 defendant's motion for summary jdgment. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 3/8/2019. (ljb)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 17, 2019

Filing 55 JUDGMENT: Pursuant to 54 findings of fact and conclusions of law entered separately today, the Court declares that Lakin Pitts's disability was a motivating factor in Lindsey & Company's decision to terminate her employment. Because Lin dsey & Company would have terminated her regardless of her disability and her requests for an accommodation; because Pitts could perform the essential functions of her job without an accommodation; and because the evidence showed that Lindsey & Compa ny provided a reasonable accommodation by providing a quiet place to record training videos, judgment is entered in favor of Lindsey & Company on the claims of Lakin Pitts. No damages or equitable relief will be awarded. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 5/17/2019. (ljb)

March 8, 2019

Filing 40 OPINION AND ORDER denying 24 defendant's motion for summary jdgment. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 3/8/2019. (ljb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pitts v. Lindsey & Company Inc
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lakin Pitts
Represented By:	Christopher Wesley Burks
Represented By:	Allison Elizabeth Ann Koile
Represented By:	Joshua Sanford
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Lindsey & Company Inc
Represented By:	Phil W. Campbell
Represented By:	Christopher Stevens
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?