Johnson v. Reynolds et al
| Demetrious Johnson |
| James Reynolds, Brawley and Roberts |
| 4:2018cv00320 |
| May 11, 2018 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Little Rock Office |
| Pulaski |
| James M. Moody |
| Joe J. Volpe |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
JUDGMENT: Pursuant to 39 order filed this date, judgment is entered dismissing this case with prejudice. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 7/20/2020. (ljb)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER approving and adopting in its entirety 28 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition as this Court's findings in all respects; granting in part and denying in part 25 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Reynolds and Bra wley; granting 22 motion for summary judgment in favor of Defendant Roberts and Plaintiff's claims against her be dismissed; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from any Order adopting this recommendation would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 4/9/2019. (ljb)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER Adopting 4 Proposed Findings and Recommendations. Defendant Nelson is dismissed from this action without prejudice due to Plaintiff's failure to state a viable claim against him or her. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 5/30/2018. (mcz)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
