Sullins v. Julian et al
| Robert Paul Sullins |
| Randy Julian, Jason Martin, Brandon Chandler, Randall Murphy and John Martin |
| 4:2018cv00324 |
| May 14, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Little Rock Office |
| Jefferson |
| J. Thomas Ray |
| Susan Webber Wright |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
JUDGMENT: Consistent with the 48 Order that was entered on this day, this case is hereby dismissed, with prejudice. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 9/11/2019. (jbh)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER approving and adopting 5 Partial Recommended Disposition in its entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; dismissing without prejudice Mr. Sullins's claims against Defendants John Martin, Randy Julian, Brandon Chandler, and Randall Murphy; dismissing without prejudice Mr. Sullins's official-capacity claims against Defendant Jason Martin, as well as his claims against Jason Martin challenging the controlled buy, search, and Mr. Sullins's arrest; directing the Clerk to prepare a summons for Jason Martin; directing the U.S. Marshal to serve the summons, complaint, and this Order on Jason Martin without prepayment of fees and costs or security; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 7/13/2018. (cmn)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
