Sims v. Warren et al
| Harold Shawgnessy Sims |
| Malenda Warren, Tonya Alexander and Does OSCE Supervisor, Jonesboro |
| 4:2018cv00656 |
| September 12, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Susan Webber Wright |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
ORDER of USCA: The Clerk of the district court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER as to #14 Notice of Appeal filed by Harold Shawgnessy Sims. (cmn)
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER of USCA as to #14 Notice of Appeal filed by Harold Shawgnessy Sims: The district court has determined that Appellant has three "strikes" under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Accordingly, Appellant may not proceed in this appeal without first paying the full appellate docketing fee. Appellant is directed to pay to the Clerk of the United States District Court the appellate docketing fee of $505, or to file a pleading in this court explaining why Appellant is eligible to proceed without pre-payment of the fee within 30 days of the date of this order. (cmn)
|
| Filing 17 USCA Docketing Letter as to #14 Notice of Appeal filed by Harold Shawgnessy Sims. USCA Case Number 18-3412. (cmn) |
| Filing 16 NOTIFICATION OF APPEAL and NOA SUPPLEMENT as to #14 Notice of Appeal re #10 Order and #11 Judgment. (cmn) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER denying #13 Plaintiff's motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis; directing the Plaintiff within 30 days to pay to this Court the $505.00 appellate filing and docketing fees or file, with the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, a motion with an attached affidavit; and directing the Plaintiff to file any future documents or pleadings related to his appeal with the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 11/8/2018. (cmn)
|
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #10 Order and #11 Judgment by Harold Shawgnessy Sims. (cmn) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis by Harold Shawgnessy Sims. (cmn) |
| Filing 12 APPELLATE FILING FEE NOTICE to Plaintiff. (cmn) |
|
Filing 11
JUDGMENT: Consistent with #10 Order, this case is dismissed. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 10/31/2018. (cmn)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER approving and adopting #8 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; dismissing without prejudice #1 , #7 Plaintiff's Complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; counting dismissal of this action as a "strike"; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order adopting the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 10/31/2018. (cmn)
|
| Filing 9 OBJECTION to #8 Proposed Findings and Recommendations by Harold Shawgnessy Sims. (cel) |
|
Filing 8
PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that Judge Wright dismiss #1 #7 Harold Shawgnessy Sims's Complaint, based on his failure to state a claim; that the dismissal counts as a "strike"; and certify that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered as frivolous and not in good faith. Objections due no later than 14 days from the date of the findings and recommendations. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 10/11/2018. (kdr)
|
| Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against all Defendants filed by Harold Shawgnessy Sims. (cel) |
| NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #5 Order. CORRECTION: The docket text was modified to correct the description to "INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONER-PLAINTIFFS", as indicated on the document. (kbc) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER directing Plaintiff to file an Amended Complaint in the enclosed 1983 complaint form, within 30 days; and directing the Clerk to mail Plaintiff a blank 42 U.S.C. 1983 complaint form along with a copy of this Order. Service is not appropriate at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 9/24/2018. (kdr)
|
|
Filing 5
INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONER-PLAINTIFFS granting #3 IFP motion; directing monthly payments be collected from plaintiff's prison trust account, until the $350 filing fee is paid in full; and directing the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this Order to the Administrator of the Craighead County Detention Center. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 9/24/2018. (kdr) Docket text modified on 9/25/2018 to correct description. (kbc)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER OF REFERRAL referring the above-styled case to Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney for further proceedings and recommendation. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 9/18/2018. (cmn)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Filing Calculation of Initial Payment of Filing Fee by Harold Shawgnessy Sims. (cel) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #1 Complaint. CORRECTION: The original document was submitted in error (wrong image file) due to a clerical mistake by the Clerk's office. The correct document was added to #1 and hereto for service/review by the parties. (kbc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against all Defendants, filed by Harold Shawgnessy Sims. (cel) Additional attachment added on 9/13/2018: #1 Main Document - Correct. (kbc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
