Gilliam v. Whitehead et al
Richard Gilliam |
Gleason, Banggs, Holladay, Jinkens and Whitehead |
4:2018cv00689 |
September 18, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Patricia S Harris |
James M Moody |
Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 DECLARATION by Richard Gilliam. (cmn) |
Filing 7 DECLARATION by Richard Gilliam. (kdr) |
Filing 6 APPELLATE FILING FEE NOTICE to Plaintiff. (ljb) |
Filing 5 JUDGMENT: Pursuant to #4 order filed this date, judgment is entered dismissing this case without prejudice. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 10/23/2018. (ljb) |
Filing 4 ORDER dismissing without prejudice #1 Gilliam's complaint. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 10/23/2018. (ljb) |
Filing 3 INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONER PLAINTIFFS denying #1 IFP application; directing the Clerk to enclose an IFP application along with a copy of this order; directing Plaintiff to return a completed IFP application with accompanying calculation sheet and certificate signed by an authorized official, or pay the $400 filing fee within 30 days of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 9/19/2018. (kdr) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against all Defendants filed by Richard Gilliam. (cel) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Richard Gilliam. (cel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.