Gilliam v. Whitehead et al
Plaintiff: Richard Gilliam
Defendant: Gleason, Banggs, Holladay, Jinkens and Whitehead
Case Number: 4:2018cv00689
Filed: September 18, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Presiding Judge: Patricia S Harris
Referring Judge: James M Moody
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 6, 2018 Filing 8 DECLARATION by Richard Gilliam. (cmn)
November 6, 2018 Filing 7 DECLARATION by Richard Gilliam. (kdr)
October 23, 2018 Filing 6 APPELLATE FILING FEE NOTICE to Plaintiff. (ljb)
October 23, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 JUDGMENT: Pursuant to #4 order filed this date, judgment is entered dismissing this case without prejudice. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 10/23/2018. (ljb)
October 23, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER dismissing without prejudice #1 Gilliam's complaint. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 10/23/2018. (ljb)
September 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONER PLAINTIFFS denying #1 IFP application; directing the Clerk to enclose an IFP application along with a copy of this order; directing Plaintiff to return a completed IFP application with accompanying calculation sheet and certificate signed by an authorized official, or pay the $400 filing fee within 30 days of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 9/19/2018. (kdr)
September 18, 2018 Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against all Defendants filed by Richard Gilliam. (cel)
September 18, 2018 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Richard Gilliam. (cel)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gilliam v. Whitehead et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gleason
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Banggs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Holladay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jinkens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Whitehead
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard Gilliam
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?