Plummer et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
| Thomas Plummer, Sr and Tammy Plummer |
| Ethicon Inc and Johnson & Johnson |
| 4:2018cv00693 |
| September 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| James M Moody |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #2 motion to admit counsel pro hac vice on behalf of Plaintiffs. Robert Kinsman is hereby admitted to appear before this Court as co-counsel of record in this action. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 10/30/2018. (ljb)
|
|
Filing 4
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting #3 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Adam W. Krause terminated. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 10/15/18. (dpb)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by Adam Krause only by All Plaintiffs (Zachary, Justin) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Appear pro hac vice by Robert Kinsman. Fee $100 receipt number 0860-3333676. Filed by All Plaintiffs (Zachary, Justin) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Tammy Plummer, Thomas Plummer, Sr. Summons issued and returned to counsel. (Fee of $400 paid, Receipt #LIT068867.) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (ljb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
