Davis v. Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility et al
| Jonathon Stewart Davis |
| Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility and Aaramark |
| 4:2018cv00764 |
| October 15, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| James M Moody |
| Joe J Volpe |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 6/13/2019. Dispositive motions due by 7/15/2019. Dispositive motions on the issue of exhaustion due by 2/13/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 12/13/2018. (lej)
|
| Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed. Aaramark c/o Corporation Company served on 11/27/2018. (llg) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE, CONSENT AND REFERENCE to a Magistrate Judge forwarded by the Clerk of Court. (lej) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to #2 Complaint with Jury Demand by Aaramark.(Block, Alexander) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Alexander Cale Block on behalf of Aaramark (Block, Alexander) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER approving and adopting in their entirety #9 Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition as this Court's findings in all respects; dismissing with prejudice all claims against Defendant Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order adopting the recommendation would not be taken in good faith. Plaintiff can proceed with his inadequate nutrition claim against Defendant Aaramark. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 12/3/2018. (ljb)
|
| Summons Issued as to Aaramark and forwarded to the U.S. Marshal for service. (ljb) |
|
Filing 9
PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS that Plaintiff be allowed to proceed with his inadequate nutrition claim against Defendant Aramark #2 . All claims against Defendant PCRDF be dismissed with prejudice. The Court certify, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from any order adopting this partial recommendation would not be taken in good faith. Objections due no later than 14 days from the date of the findings and recommendations. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 11/16/2018. (lej)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER that the Clerk shall prepare summons for Defendant Aramark and the USM shall serve this defendant without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefore. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 11/16/2018. (lej)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting Plaintiff's Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit #6 . Service will be issued in a separate order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 11/16/2018. (lej)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jonathon Stewart Davis. (ljb) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER denying Plaintiff's Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit #1 . Plaintiff shall submit within 30 days of the date of this order either: (1) the statutory filing fee of $400; or (2) a proper and complete Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit, with the required calculation sheet and certified copy of his trust fund account statement for the preceding six months. Failure to do so may result in dismissal of this action without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 10/16/2018. (lej)
|
|
Filing 4
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER denying Plaintiff's motion for service #3 . Plaintiff's complaint must first be screened pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 10/15/2018. (lej)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION to Serve Summons by Jonathon Stewart Davis. (ljb) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Jonathon Stewart Davis. (ljb) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jonathon Stewart Davis. (ljb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
