Dailey/Shaheed-X v. Pulaski County Circuit Court et al
Willie L Dailey/Shaheed-X |
Pulaski County Circuit Court and Arkansas, State of |
4:2018cv00773 |
October 17, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
J Thomas Ray |
Billy Roy Wilson |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. § 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 JUDGMENT: Consistent with #3 that was entered on this day, this action is dismissed, without prejudice. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 11/26/2018. (ljb) |
Filing 3 ORDER approving and adopting #2 Recommended Disposition in its entirety; denying #1 Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus; dismissing, without prejudice, this case; and denying a Certificate of Appealabilty. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 11/26/2018. (ljb) |
Filing 2 RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION recommending the #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be dismissed without prejudice to Dailey's right to file a successive habeas petition, if authorized to do so by the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals; further recommending a Certificate of Appealability be denied; Objections due within 14 days of the date of this Recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 10/24/18. (tjb) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Willie L Dailey/Shaheed-X.(kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.