Hayworth v. White et al
Roy Edmond Hayworth |
White, Maxwell, Figuerroa and Ewing |
4:2018cv00799 |
October 26, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
James M Moody |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 E-MAIL received from U.S. District Court, Western District of Arkansas, confirming the case was received and opened in their district as case number 4:18-cv-04152. (thd) |
Filing 4 ORDER directing the Clerk of Court to transfer this case immediately to the United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas, Texarkana Division. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 11/2/2018. (cmn) |
Docket Note: Case electronically transferred to the United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas, Texarkana Division on this date. (cmn) |
Filing 3 ORDER referring this case to United States Magistrate Judge Beth Deere for findings and recommendations. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 10/31/2018. (ljb) |
NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re: #2 Complaint. CORRECTION: The docket entry was modified to correct the file date to 10/26/2018, as marked on the document. (thd) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Roy Edmond Hayworth.(kdr) (Docket entry modified on 10/30/2018 to correct the file date.)(thd). |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Roy Edmond Hayworth. (kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.