Kirk v. May et al
Joshua Arvil Kirk |
Bill Gilkey, Darrel Elkin and Mike Lee May |
4:2018cv00864 |
November 20, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Jerome T Kearney |
Billy Roy Wilson |
Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 EXHIBITS by Joshua Arvil Kirk. (ljb) |
Filing 17 EXHIBITS by Joshua Arvil Kirk. (ljb) (Docket text modified on 12/20/2018 to correct the party filer) (jak) |
NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #17 Exhibits. CORRECTION: The docket text was modified to correct the party filer as Joshua Arvil Kirk as marked on the document. (jak) |
Filing 16 ORDER adopting #3 proposed findings and recommendations in their entirety; and dismissing Defendant Gilkey for failure to state a claim. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 12/17/2018. (ljb) |
Filing 15 EXHIBITS by Joshua Arvil Kirk. (ljb) |
Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed. Darrel Elkin c/o Yell County Detention Center served on 12/3/2018. (llg) |
Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed. Mike Lee May served on 12/3/2018. (llg) |
Filing 12 NOTICE, CONSENT AND REFERENCE to a Magistrate Judge forwarded by the Clerk of Court to the parties. (lmc) |
Filing 11 OBJECTION to #3 Proposed Findings and Recommendations by Joshua Arvil Kirk. (ljb) |
Filing 10 (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting #9 Plaintiff's Motion for Copies. The Clerk shall forward to Plaintiff a copy of the docket sheet. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 12/10/18. (pdw) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Copies by Joshua Arvil Kirk. (llg) |
Filing 8 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: The parties shall complete discovery on or before 06/07/19, and file any dispositive motions on or before 07/07/19. A Motion based on failure to exhaust must be filed by February 7, 2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 12/06/2018. (lmc) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by C. Burt Newell on behalf of Darrel Elkin, Bill Gilkey, Mike Lee May (Newell, C.) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to #2 Complaint by Darrel Elkin, Bill Gilkey, Mike Lee May.(Hays, Caroline) |
Filing 5 ORDER granting #1 Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis; directing monthly payments be collected from Plaintiff's prison trust account, until a total of $350 has been collected and forwarded to the Clerk of the Court; directing the Clerk of the Court to prepare summons for Defendants Mike Lee May and Darrel Elkin; directing the USMS to serve a copy of #2 Complaint and summons on Defendants without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefore; and directing the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to the Yell County Jail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 11/21/2018. (kdr) |
Filing 4 INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONERS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 11/21/2018. (lmc) |
Filing 3 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS recommending #2 Defendant Gilkey be DISMISSED from this action, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Objections are due no later than 14 days from the date of the findings and recommendations. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 11/21/2018. (lmc) |
Summons Issued as to Darrel Elkin and Mike Lee May and Forwarded to USMS for service. (kdr) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Joshua Arvil Kirk. (ljb) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Joshua Arvil Kirk. (ljb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.