Hedrick v. University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences et al
Madison Hedrick |
Appalanaidu Sasapu and University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences |
4:2018cv00944 |
December 28, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Kristine G Baker |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Complaint , filed by Madison Hedrick. University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences served on 2/12/2019. (Kitchens, Lloyd) |
Summons Issued and returned to counsel for plaintiff for service as to Office of the President, University of Arkansas System. (jap) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Appalanaidu Sasapu.(Littleton, David) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by David A. Littleton on behalf of Appalanaidu Sasapu (Littleton, David) |
Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Complaint , filed by Madison Hedrick. University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences served on 1/7/2019. (Kitchens, Lloyd) |
Filing 2 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Complaint , filed by Madison Hedrick. Appalanaidu Sasapu served on 1/7/2019. (Kitchens, Lloyd) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Madison Hedrick against All Defendants. Fee $400. Receipt Number LIT070185. Summons issued and returned to counsel for service. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(cmn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.