Holdford v. Reynolds
| Timothy A Holdford |
| Reynolds |
| 4:2019cv00019 |
| January 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Jerome T Kearney |
| James M Moody |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 APPELLATE FILING FEE NOTICE to Plaintiff. (kdr) |
Filing 8
JUDGMENT: Pursuant to #7 Order entered in this matter on this date, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged that this case is dismissed without prejudice, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Judgment and accompanying Order dismissing this action would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 1/25/2019. (kdr)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER adopting in their entirety #3 the proposed findings and recommendations; dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint and Amended Complaint, without prejudice, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; constituting this dismissal as a "strike"; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from an Order and Judgment dismissing this action would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 1/25/2019. (kdr)
|
| Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Reynolds filed by Timothy A Holdford. (ljb) |
| Filing 5 OBJECTION to #3 Report and Recommendations by Timothy A Holdford. (kdr) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #1 Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis ; directing monthly payments be collected from Plaintiff's prison trust; and directing the Clerk to forward a copy of this Order to the Pulaski County Detention Facility. Service is not appropriate at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 1/11/2019. (kdr)
|
|
Filing 3
PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS recommending #2 Plaintiff's Complaint against Defendant be DISMISSED for failure to state a claim. Dismissal of this action constitute a strike within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from an Order and Judgment dismissing this action would not be taken in good faith. Objections are due no later than 14 days from the date of the findings and recommendations. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 01/11/2019. (lmc)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Reynolds filed by Timothy A Holdford. (ljb) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Timothy A Holdford. (ljb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Holdford v. Reynolds | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Timothy A Holdford | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Reynolds | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
