May v. Arkansas State Crime Laboratory et al
| Parnell R May |
| Arkansas State Crime Laboratory, Eric Westhafer, Stephens A Erickson, William Pope, Sharon Pulla and Charles P Kokes |
| 4:2019cv00024 |
| January 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| James M Moody |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 EVIDENCE by Parnell R May. (ljb) |
| Filing 5 EVIDENCE by Parnell R May. (llg) |
Filing 4
ORDER directing the Clerk of the Court to stay and administratively terminate this proceeding pending final disposition of May's state criminal charges; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal of this order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 1/15/2019. (ljb)
|
|
Filing 3
INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONER-PLAINTIFFS granting #1 motion; directing monthly payments be made from Plaintiff's institutional account for the $350 filing fee; and directing the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this Order to the Administrator of the Pulaski County Detention Center. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 1/14/2019. (ljb)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Parnell R May. (llg) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Parnell R May. (llg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
