Odom v. Emberton
| Eric Odom |
| Lucas Emberton |
| 4:2019cv00228 |
| April 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Beth Deere |
| Brian S Miller |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 29 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Eric Odom re #24 Appellate Filing Fee Notice. (fjg) |
| Filing 28 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Eric Odom re #22 Order granting motion to dismiss, #23 Judgment. (fjg) |
| Filing 27 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Eric Odom re #21 Order denying motion to amend complaint. (fjg) |
| Filing 26 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Eric Odom re #20 Motion to Add Statement of Claim. (fjg) |
| Filing 25 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Eric Odom re #17 Motion to Amend Complaint, #18 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. (fjg) |
| Filing 24 APPELLATE FILING FEE NOTICE to Plaintiff. (jbh) |
Filing 23
JUDGMENT: Consistent with the #22 Order that was entered on this day, this case is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 6/4/2019. (jbh)
|
|
Filing 22
ORDER granting #19 motion to dismiss; dismissing with prejudice all claims; denying #17 , #18 , #20 Mr. Odom's pending motions as moot; and instructing the Clerk to close this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 6/4/2019. (jbh)
|
|
Filing 21
ORDER denying #13 motion to amend complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 6/3/2019. (jbh)
|
| Filing 20 MOTION to Add Statement of Claim re #1 Complaint by Eric Odom. (kdr) |
| Filing 19 STIPULATION of Dismissal (Joint Stipulation of Dismissal) by Lucas Emberton. (Davis, JaNan) |
| Filing 18 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Eric Odom. (ljb) |
| Filing 17 MOTION to Amend #1 Complaint by Eric Odom. (ljb) |
| Filing 16 EXHIBITS by Eric Odom. (llg) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE, CONSENT AND REFERENCE to a Magistrate Judge forwarded by the Clerk of Court. (csf) |
|
Filing 14
SCHEDULING ORDER: If Defendant intends to pursue a defense that Plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies before filing this lawsuit, it must be raised by motion for summary judgment no later than 6/12/2019. Discovery is stayed until further Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 5/13/2019. (csf)
|
| Filing 13 MOTION to Amend #1 Complaint by Eric Odom. (llg) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Lucas Emberton.(Davis, JaNan) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by JaNan Arnold Davis on behalf of Lucas Emberton (Davis, JaNan) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed. Lucas Emberton served on 4/30/2019. (fjg) |
| Filing 9 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Complaint filed by Eric Odom. (Docketed pursuant to #8 Order.) (cmn) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Odom's motion to amend; and instructing the Clerk to file Mr. Odom's motion to amend as a supplement to his complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 5/2/2019. (cmn)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Amend #1 Complaint by Eric Odom. (kdr) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #5 motion for jury trial. If Mr. Odom has any claims remaining after the Court has ruled on dispositive motions, the Court will refer this matter to Chief Judge Miller for a jury trial setting. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 4/25/2019. (csf)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Jury Trial by Eric Odom. (ljb) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #3 motion for IFP status; directing monthly payments be made from Plaintiff's prison trust account for the $350 filing fee; directing the Clerk of Court to send a copy of this Order to the ADC Trust Fund Centralized Banking Office, the ADC Compliance Division, and the Van Buren County Jail; directing the Clerk of Court to prepare a summons for Defendant Emberton; and directing the U.S. Marshal to serve copies of #1 complaint, with any attachments, and a summons on Defendant Emberton, without requiring prepayment of fees and costs or security. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 4/11/2019. (cmn)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Eric Odom. (llg) |
| Summons Issued as to Lucas Emberton and forwarded to the U.S. Marshal for service. (cmn) |
|
Filing 2
INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONER-PLAINTIFFS directing the Clerk of Court to enclose an IFP application along with a copy of this Order; and directing the Plaintiff to return a completed IFP application or pay a $400 filing fee within 30 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 4/5/2019. (cmn)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Lucas Emberton, filed by Eric Odom.(kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Odom v. Emberton | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Eric Odom | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Lucas Emberton | |
| Represented By: | JaNan Arnold Davis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
