Torrence v. Automobile Club Inter-Insurance Exchange
Kathleen Torrence |
Automobile Club Inter-Insurance Exchange |
4:2019cv00354 |
May 16, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
D P Marshall |
James M Moody |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT. Pursuant to #15 Order, the Clerk's office has reassigned the case to Judge James M. Moody Jr. (jak) |
Filing 15 ORDER transferring this case to the Honorable James M. Moody Jr. Any objection to transfer should be made by 7/19/2019, and Judge Moody will address it. The Court directs the Clerk to make the transfer by chip exchange. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 7/11/2019. (jak) |
Filing 14 (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER: Motion, No. #13 , granted. Reply, No. [13-1], deemed filed. In the future, any moving party may reply within seven calendar days of a response. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 7/10/2019. (slb) |
Filing 13 MOTION for Leave to File Reply to #8 Motion to Remand by Kathleen Torrence. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Reply)(Steadman, Timothy)(Docket text modified on 7/8/2019 to establish linkage) (jak) |
Filing 12 AFFIDAVIT re #10 Response in Opposition to Motion,, of Gail C. Louis by Automobile Club Inter-Insurance Exchange. (Crass, Kevin) |
Filing 11 AFFIDAVIT re #10 Response in Opposition to Motion,, of Wendy Kight by Automobile Club Inter-Insurance Exchange. (Crass, Kevin) |
Filing 10 RESPONSE in Opposition re #8 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Automobile Club Inter-Insurance Exchange. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Auto Policy, #2 Exhibit Letter, #3 Exhibit Letter from Hendricks, #4 Exhibit Letter from Kight, #5 Exhibit Fax, #6 Exhibit Summons Complaint, #7 Exhibit Proof of Service, #8 Exhibit Email, #9 Exhibit Motion to Dismiss, #10 Exhibit Motion and Brief, #11 Exhibit Summons Amended Complaint, #12 Exhibit Proof of Service, #13 Exhibit Corporation Information)(Crass, Kevin) |
Filing 9 BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #8 Remand to State Court filed by Kathleen Torrence. (Steadman, Timothy) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Kathleen Torrence (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B)(Steadman, Timothy) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to #5 Amended Complaint with Jury Demand by Automobile Club Inter-Insurance Exchange.(Crass, Kevin) |
Filing 6 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION and Memorandum Brief in Support of her Motion for Voluntary Non-Suit of her Claims against Defendant AAA Arkansas Insurance Agency, Inc. by Kathleen Torrence. (kdr) |
Filing 5 AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Automobile Club Inter-Insurance Exchange, filed by Kathleen Torrence.(kdr) |
Filing 4 BRIEF IN SUPPORT of #3 Motion to Dismiss by AAA Arkansas Arkansas Insurance Agency, Inc. (kdr) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss by AAA Arkansas Insurance Agency Inc. (kdr) |
Filing 2 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against AAA Arkansas Insurance Agency Inc, filed by Kathleen Torrence.(kdr) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL - CAFA Diversity Jurisdiction by Automobile Club Inter-Insurance Exchange from Pulaski County Circuit Court, Case Number 60CV-19-1251. Fee of $400 paid. Receipt Number LIT072199. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.