Colston v. Johnson et al
| Curtis Colston |
| Mark Klappenbach, Waymond M Brown, Kirk D Johnson and Phillip T Whiteaker |
| 4:2019cv00373 |
| May 28, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Billy Roy Wilson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 APPELLATE FILING FEE NOTICE to Plaintiff. (ljb) |
Filing 4
JUDGMENT: Based on #3 order entered today, this case is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 5/30/2019. (ljb)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #1 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis; directing monthly payments be made from Plaintiff's prison trust account for the $350 filing fee; directing the Clerk of Court to send a copy of this Order to the ADC Trust Fund Centralized Banking Office, the ADC Compliance Office, and the Warden of the Wrightsville Unit; dismissing #2 complaint without prejudice; and counting this dismissal as a "strike" for purposes of 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment will not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 5/30/2019. (ljb)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Curtis Colston. (ljb) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Curtis Colston. (ljb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
