Bowman v. Hot Spring County, Arkansas et al
| Christopher Jason Bowman |
| Woody, John Does, Hot Spring County Sheriff's Department, Daniel Bailey, Cory Rickard and Hot Spring County, Arkansas |
| 4:2019cv00523 |
| July 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Billy Roy Wilson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting #3 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss because the Hot Springs Sheriff's Department is not a suable entity. Accordingly, the Hot Springs Sheriff's Department is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 08/26/19. (dmm)
|
| Filing 4 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Conference to occur by 10/30/2019. Rule 26(f) Report due by 11/13/2019. Jury Trial set for 8/25/2020 at 9:30 AM in Little Rock Courtroom # A401 before Judge Billy Roy Wilson. Entered at the direction of the Court on 8/23/19. (mmb) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss by Hot Spring County Sheriff's Department (Ohm, Ralph) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Hot Spring County, Arkansas.(Ohm, Ralph) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Christopher Jason Bowman. Fee of $400 paid. Receipt Number LIT073192. Summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
