Johnson v. Sheffield Financial
| Scott M Johnson |
| Sheffield Financial |
| 4:2019cv00616 |
| September 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Billy Roy Wilson |
| Banks and Banking |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Defendant Sheffield Financial's ANSWER to #2 Complaint and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint and, COUNTERCLAIM for Breach of Contract against Scott M Johnson by Sheffield Financial. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-Note and Security Agreement)(Tom, Robert) |
Filing 9
ORDER: Based on the record before me, I am unable to #4 compel arbitration at this time. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 10/2/2019. (ljb)
|
| Filing 8 BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #4 Motion to Compel, filed by Sheffield Financial. (Tom, Robert) |
|
Filing 7
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting #6 Defendant's Motion for Leave to File Reply. Accordingly, Defendant must file the reply, attached to the motion as an exhibit, by 5 p.m., Monday, October 7, 2019. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 09/30/19. (dmm)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to File Reply in Support of Its Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, to Stay All Proceedings in this Action by Sheffield Financial (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Reply in Support)(Tom, Robert) |
| Filing 5 RESPONSE in Opposition re #4 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, to Stay all Proceedings in this Action filed by Scott M Johnson. (Niswanger, Stephen) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, to Stay all Proceedings in this Action by Sheffield Financial (Attachments: #1 Document Memorandum in Support of Motion to Compel, #2 Exhibit 1-to Memorandum in Support)(Tom, Robert) |
| Filing 3 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Conference to occur by 11/12/2019. Rule 26(f) Report due by 11/26/2019. Jury Trial set for 10/6/2020 at 9:30 AM in Little Rock Courtroom # A401 before Judge Billy Roy Wilson. Entered at the direction of the Court on 9/4/19. (mmb) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Sheffield Financial, filed by Scott M Johnson. (jbh) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Sheffield Financial from Lonoke County Circuit Court, case number 43CV-19-00659. Fee of $400 paid; Receipt number LIT073748. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jbh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Johnson v. Sheffield Financial | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Scott M Johnson | |
| Represented By: | Stephen B. Niswanger |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Sheffield Financial | |
| Represented By: | Robert F. Tom |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
